Tag Archives: construction contracts

7 Most Important Provisions in a Missouri Construction Contract

Contracts are one of the most critical elements of a construction project. They can determine whether the contractor profits or loses money. There are numerous clauses that demand the attention of contractors, estimators, and any other parties involved in a construction contract.

Recently, Daniel Gabris of Gabris Law delivered a presentation to the American Society of Project Estimators regarding important provisions in a construction contract as well as discussed cases that related to each of the provisions. A copy of the powerpoint, which was converted into a pdf file, can be viewed at the link below.

7 Most Important Provisions in a Missouri Construction Contract

Can I Collect Attorney’s Fees in my Missouri Construction Dispute?

When I receive a phone call from a new potential client, the most common question that I get is:

“Can we collect attorney’s fees from the opposing party?”

The answer to this question is generally NO—unless, you have a contractual or statutory basis for collecting the same. In certain limited cases, the Courts may award fees on the basis of equity, but this exception is virtually non-existent from a practical standpoint.

Our law firm reviews and intakes a variety of different cases on an average day. Given our focus on construction litigation, we see cases involving issues arising on both residential and commercial construction projects, ranging from defective work claims to failure to pay claims to disputes arising from delay and timing issues to contractors or subcontractors disappearing with the money, among others.

Whether the potential client can recover attorney’s fees is incredibly important and can significantly change the leverage that the potential client has in the case because attorney’s fees can get very costly, depending on the case, and in some instances, the more complex cases can span a period of over several years, thus making the question of collecting attorney’s fees a critical piece of information.

We understand that it is also an important consideration for our potential clients to know their rights prior to getting involved in expensive construction litigation, and it is well-advised for all individuals to know their rights prior to undertaking an expensive construction project.

As noted above, the short answer is that Missouri does not allow for the recovery of attorney’s fees in construction disputes, except in a few select scenarios:

“Missouri follows the American rule which precludes recovery of attorney fees with these exceptions: (1) a statute or a contractual provision allows for their recovery; (2) the fees are incurred due to involvement in collateral litigation; or (3) equity demands it.” Marcomb v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 934 S.W.2d 17 (Mo. App. 1996).

Typically, parties to construction disputes are limited only to the first exception stated above: if a statute or contractual provision allows for the recovery of attorney’s fees. The collateral litigation exception involves a unique set of factual circumstances and, could conceivably be asserted if the stars align, but it is not commonly seen in construction litigation. The equitable exception is limited to very narrow circumstances, and Missouri courts are often reluctant to entertain utilizing such exception to allow recovery of fees because it would be such a drastic (or proactive) departure from the norm by the Court, which is not usually favored.

Accordingly, due to the fact that parties involved in construction litigation are typically limited to recovery of fees only if such recovery is provided for in the contract or pursuant to some applicable statute, this article will briefly discuss contracts and will go into a more in-depth discussion as to the governing statutory rights of parties involved in construction projects.

In order for a party to have a right to collect attorney’s fees based on a contract, there must be a provision in the contract specifically allowing for such recovery. Because construction contracts come in all shapes and sizes and can include innumerable provisions or language regarding the same, it is virtually impossible to cover every potential attorney’s fees provision that could exist in a contract.

One example includes a scenario where the contract allows for the recovery of fees “if the contractor retains counsel to collect on an outstanding balance that exists on the contract.” In this particular situation, the contractor can likely collect attorney’s fees if the contractor is successful in prosecuting a claim for collection of an outstanding balance. However, if the contractor is defending a claim in which the owner alleges defective work, then the contractor would not be able to recover attorney’s fees, even if the contractor is successful in defending the claim. As a sidebar, the contractor would be well-advised to have an experienced attorney craft a contractual provision that is broader and more encompassing to be able to collect attorney’s fees in the successful defense of a defective work claim.

The foregoing example poses a situation where the attorney’s fees provision is incredibly fact specific, and thus, it would be futile to try to cover the endless possibilities, speculating as to what the contractual language may be. However, there are some constants when analyzing recovery of attorney’s fees in construction disputes, and those arise from the applicable statutes.

Accordingly, the focus of this article is to explore various scenarios a contractor or owner may face where no applicable attorney’s fees provision is set forth in the contract governing the parties’ relationship. In an effort to do so, we will proceed with an analysis of a number of commonly seen scenarios involving construction projects.

We will start by looking at the statues (or Acts) that are the most applicable, when it comes to construction disputes, in an effort to provide preliminary information to the reader prior to undertaking the analysis.

1.     Missouri Prompt Payment Act (Public or Private)

As you may be able to gather from the name of the Act, the purpose of the Missouri Prompt Payment Act is to encourage prompt payment to those persons or entities providing work on a construction project.

The Missouri Public Prompt Payment Act is set forth under R.S.Mo. § 34.057 and requires payment to be made promptly and on a monthly basis, based on estimates provided by the contractor. R.S.Mo. § 34.057(1).

The Missouri Private Prompt Payment Act is set forth under R.S.Mo. § 431.180 and states: “[a]ll persons who enter into a contract for private design or construction work after August 28, 1995, shall make all scheduled payments pursuant to the terms of the contract.” R.S.Mo. § 431.180.1.

The Private Prompt Payment Act provides the remedy in the second paragraph, allowing for the recovery of actual damages, attorney’s fees, and 18% interest per annum on any outstanding balance:

“[a]ny person who has not been paid in accordance with subsection 1 of this section may bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction against a person who has failed to pay.  The court may in addition to any other award for damages, award interest at the rate of up to one and one-half percent per month from the date payment was due pursuant to the terms of the contract, and reasonable attorney fees, to the prevailing party.” R.S.Mo. § 431.180.2.

There are certain limitations to the Missouri Private Prompt Payment Act, however, and we usually attempt to convey to clients the notion that the Private Prompt Payment Act only applies in the commercial context as opposed to those projects involving consumers. However, from a technical standpoint, that would be inaccurate, as the statute specifically states: “The provisions of this section shall not apply to contracts for private construction work for the building, improvement, repair or remodeling of owner-occupied residential property of four units or less.” R.S.Mo. § 431.180.3.


2.     Missouri Merchandising Practices Act

The Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (“MMPA”) is set of statutes which aims at protecting consumers. Typically, we describe the MMPA to clients as the equivalent of the Federal Consumer Protection Act but at a state level. The goal of the MMPA is to prevent businesses and larger entities from taking advantage of consumers through the use of deceptive, fraudulent, or other unfair business practices.

The operative statutes of the MMPA are set forth under R.S.Mo. § 407.020 and R.S.Mo. § 407.025. Specifically, R.S.Mo. § 407.020 states:

The act, use or employment by any person of any deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, unfair practice or the concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise in trade or commerce…is declared to be an unlawful practice.

R.S.Mo. § 407.025.1 creates a private cause of action for consumers:

Any person who purchases or leases merchandise primarily for personal, family or household purposes and thereby suffers an ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal, as a result of the use or employment by another person of a method, act or practice declared unlawful by section 407.020, may bring a private civil action in either the circuit court of the county in which the seller or lessor resides or in which the transaction complained of took place, to recover actual damages.

The same statutory section also allows for recovery of punitive damages and attorney’s fees: “The court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may award to the prevailing party attorney’s fees, based on the amount of time reasonably expended, and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper.” R.S.Mo. § 407.025.1.

The language in the statute gives the Court broad discretion in awarding attorney’s fees to the prevailing party. However, there is substantial case law discussing the purpose of the statute is to protect consumers, so it is incredibly difficult for an entity (or non-consumer) to obtain an award of attorney’s fees, even if the entity/non-consumer prevails.

Analysis of Common Construction Dispute Scenarios

Below consists of a discussion of various scenarios that are regularly observed in the construction context. While the analyses are not comprehensive, the purpose of this article is to examine whether legal authority exists to recover attorney’s fees in the examples provided. In all of the scenarios, the contract does not allow for the recovery of attorney’s fees, as we know from above, the contract would provide a basis for recovery. The idea behind excluding the right to recover fees in the hypothetical scenarios is to conduct an in-depth examination of the parties’ statutory rights to collect fees on construction projects.

Scenario 1: Contractor performs construction work on residential property and seeks payment of outstanding balance owed

Tommy owns a construction company, TM Construction, LLC (“TM Construction”). TM Construction provides interior construction services on both residential and commercial projects. On this specific project, TM Construction is working on Sarah Johnson’s personal residence to provide framing work, hanging drywall, and painting. TM Construction’s contract with Sarah requires her to make payment of half of the job up front and the remaining amount will be paid at the completion of the project. Payment is made at the beginning of the job as contemplated, and TM Construction completes the work on the project. TM Construction demands payment from Sarah, but she refuses to make payment. The contract does not include any provision for the recovery of attorney’s fees, can TM Construction collect attorney’s fees?

The short answer is no. The contract does not afford TM Construction rights to recover fees. Further, TM Construction does not have any statutory basis to do so because the Missouri Private Prompt Payment Act does not apply to owner-occupied residential property of four units or less. The Missouri Public Prompt Payment Act and the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act are wholly inapplicable to this situation.

Scenario 2: Contractor performs work on commercial building and seeks payment of outstanding balance owed

ABC Electrical, Inc. (“ABC Electrical”) is providing electrical rough-in work on a three-story office building owned by XYZ Developers, LLC (“XYZ Developers”). ABC Electrical performs the work and is paid according to the payment schedule set forth in the contract. The payment schedule is based on percentage of completion, which is supervised and monitored by an architect and the owner. The contract is silent as to collection of attorney’s fees.

Throughout the project, ABC Electrical is performing the work and the owner is making payment in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in the project. Once the Project is about 70% complete, the owner starts to withhold any further payment. ABC Electrical completes the job and the architect has no objection as to the work. ABC Electrical’s owner pleads with the owner of XYZ Developers, but XYZ Developers’ owner refuses to make the final payment.  Can ABC Electrical collect attorney’s fees?

The answer is that ABC Electrical has the right to collect attorney’s fees pursuant to the Missouri Private Prompt Payment Act. The party that prevails in the claim, ABC Electrical or XYZ Developers, will have the right to collect attorney’s fees. The award of attorney’s fees is at the discretion of the court, but typically the courts will award attorney’s fees if one of the parties is deemed to have prevailed.

Scenario 3: General Contractor hires Subcontractor who performs defective work on commercial project which General Contractor has to repair/replace

Exito Construction, Inc. (“Exito”) is a general contractor constructing a commercial building. S&S Exteriors, LLC (“S&S Exteriors”) is hired as a subcontractor to perform the masonry work on the building. The contract calls for monthly progress payments that correspond with the percentage of completion.  S&S Exteriors is more than halfway through with completion of the project when Exito notices and complains that the bricks are not being laid evenly and that the building is missing lintels that were specifically called for in the design and specifications. Exito withholds payment to S&S Exteriors until the issues with the masonry work are repaired. Exito has the right to withhold payment until the architect approves the work. S&S Exteriors refuses to make any repairs until payment is made.

After numerous exchanges of correspondence between counsel for the parties, Exito has no other option but to proceed with the hiring of another masonry subcontractor, J&J Masonry, Inc., to complete the work. J&J Masonry charges significantly more to complete the job than S&S Exteriors charged for the entire job. Exito wants to recover damages incurred for having to hire J&J Masonry to complete S&S Exteriors’ work. The contract is silent as to attorney’s fees.

Typically on large construction projects like that described above, the parties are sophisticated and usually have provisions in the contracts which would govern attorney’s fees. However, in this particular instance, there was no contractual provision accounting for recovery of fees. Can Exito recover attorney’s fees if it is successful in proving that S&S Exteriors was properly terminated from the project and that additional costs were incurred as a result of bringing J&J Masonry onto the project to complete the work?

The answer is generally no. Without a contractual provision, there is no legal authority from which to recover attorney’s fees, as the Missouri Private Prompt Payment Act does not govern this scenario because Exito is not bringing a claim that relates to payment.

However, the caveat is that S&S Exteriors would likely bring counterclaims in the lawsuit based on the Missouri Prompt Payment Act, and then the successful party would be entitled to collect attorney’s fees. This would be a situation where the opposing party opens the door to allowing for the recovery of attorney’s fees for Exito, if Exito is successful in its defense of the Prompt Payment Act claim and if the judge decides to award attorney’s fees.

Scenario 4: Contractor performs allegedly defective work on residential property and is defending homeowner’s claim of defective work

John Bruiser owns a remodeling company, Bruiser Construction, LLC. He typically remodels bathrooms, kitchens, and basements, and he’s been in business for 25 years. He meets a young couple, the Smiths, in their late 30s, early 40s, and Bruiser agrees to remodel their kitchen for a fixed price of $45,000.00, which includes the replacement of cabinets and flooring, as well as some painting, and minor drywall work. He also agreed to build the cabinets himself, which would be included in that price as well. There was no specific schedule, but he told the Smiths that he would have the project completed in no more than 3 months.

As construction progresses, the Smiths can tell that this project is going to take a lot longer than 3 months. The cabinets are not even fully constructed within the first 5 months, and the flooring is not lining up and is not level in certain areas. The contractor clearly did not know how to perform this job in a good and workmanlike manner. The project is going on 14 months, and the Smiths are irate. The contractor had bit off more than he could chew, and after the Smiths raised numerous complaints, Bruiser stopped answering their text messages or calls. He essentially disappeared.

Can the Smiths recovery attorney’s fees?

In this case, the question depends on whether the home on which Bruiser was performing work was the personal residence of the Smiths. If it was, then it also depends on whether the contract was merely negligent or committed some fraudulent, unscrupulous or unfair business practice. The simple failure to perform the work in a good and workmanlike manner is not sufficient. However, if there was something suspect going on with the contractor, there may be a statutory right to recover attorney’s fees pursuant to a claim based on violations of the MMPA.

Scenario 5: Contractor collects down payment for residential construction project and disappears with homeowner’s money

Randy Cognito (“Cognito”) is a fly by night contractor who performs roofing work. He is operating under the fictitious name (d/b/a) of Quality Roofing. Randy is a smooth talking salesman who convinces the homeowner to rebuild her deck for the “modest” fee of $42,000.00. The payment plan is to be structured into 3 installment payments of $14,000.00 each. The payments will be made (1) prior to Cognito commencing the work, (2) at the 50% completion point, and the last payment will be made (3) when the project is completed.

The homeowner wants to get the job moving because winter is quickly approaching, so she presses Cognito to start the work. Cognito explains to her that they cannot do anything until the first $14,000.00 payment is made in full. So, the homeowner writes a check and mails it to Cognito. Several weeks pass, and the homeowner does not hear anything from Cognito. Although, the check that she sent to him was cashed a few days after it was sent. The homeowner continues calling Cognito and never receives a response.

After numerous months pass without hearing from Cognito, the homeowner has a discussion with a neighbor who had the same thing happen to him. Cognito took his money and ran off with it.

Sadly, this situation happens all of the time. Can the homeowner collect attorney’s fees in this situation?

The answer is yes, but this article would neglect an important analysis if it did not briefly discuss throwing good money at bad. For every client who calls inquiring about this type of situation, our law firm discusses the possibility that we may never find the fraudulent contractor (Cognito) or that we might find him, but when we find him and take judgment, he has no money to collect on or is hiding assets.

These are all factors that the homeowner must take into consideration before proceeding against an unscrupulous or fraudulent contractor. However, after the homeowner has conducted an analysis and believes that it is in her best interests to proceed against the contractor, can she recover attorney’s fees?

The answer is: yes, there is a basis to seek recovery of attorney’s fees. The Missouri Merchandising Practices Act allows for the recovery of attorney’s fees when a contractor or company commits unlawful practices (i.e., deceptive, fraudulent, misrepresentations, false pretenses, omissions of material facts, etc.) against a consumer. In this case, Cognito duping the homeowner into paying $14,000.00 and then running off with her money would rise to the level of unlawful practices. This is a potential tool at the client’s disposal, but the client should also alert the Missouri Attorney General to prevent other unsuspecting victims from having to suffer through the same unfortunate and sad situation.

Scenario 6: Contractor begins residential construction project and changes pricing in middle of project

Sammy Samson (“Samson”) is a self-proclaimed general contractor. He pretty much does it all as far as interior repairs. He was hired by John Goodson to perform repairs and rehab work on a variety of different areas in the property, including drywalling, mudding, taping, and painting a bedroom; complete remodel of a kitchen; and replacement of shower enclosure in the bathroom. Samson prepared an estimate for Mr. Goodson, breaking down the project into 3 categories. Each scope of work had a fixed price for each portion. After Mr. Goodson reviewed the estimate, he liked the price and signed a contract with Samson, which reflected the fixed price amounts that Samson set forth in his estimate.

Samson began the project promptly and completed the drywalling, mudding, and taping portions of the work. However, shortly after beginning the painting, he submitted an additional invoice to Mr. Goodson, which was not included as part of the original estimate. He stated that the price of paint was rising due to tariffs and that Mr. Goodson owed him an additional $1,500.00, which must be paid before Samson will continue performing any additional work.

At this point, Mr. Goodson had already paid $5,000.00, and he feels like he’s being held hostage because he is stuck in the middle of the project and has to pay more amounts (that were not agreed to) in order to complete the work. Mr. Goodson does not feel like he’s being treated fairly, so he contacts the lawyer.

The first question Mr. Goodson asks after he tells his story is: “Can I collect attorney’s fees if we go after this guy?”
The answer is that there is a legal basis to support collection of attorney’s fees. The Missouri Merchandising Practices Act was designed to protect consumers from fraudulent billing practices like those which Samson was attempting to employ. The collection of attorney’s fees is at the discretion of the judge, but if Mr. Goodson can successfully prove his claim under the MMPA, then a judge is likely to award the same.


This article covers whether parties involved in construction litigation have the legal right to collect attorney’s fees.

Generally, the parties do not have a right to collect attorney’s fees on a construction project, unless there is a provision in the contract allowing the same or some statutory basis for collection of the same.

Missouri typically follows the American Rule:

“…which precludes recovery of attorney fees with these exceptions: (1) a statute or a contractual provision allows for their recovery; (2) the fees are incurred due to involvement in collateral litigation; or (3) equity demands it.” Marcomb v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 934 S.W.2d 17 (Mo. App. 1996).

Apart from a contractual basis, the two most common bases for collection of fees in a construction dispute are through the Missouri Prompt Payment Act and the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.

There are two types of Prompt Payment Acts in Missouri (public and private). However, for purposes of this article, the Prompt Payment Act’s effect is essentially covered in the following excerpt from the applicable statute: “[a]ll persons who enter into a contract for private design or construction work after August 28, 1995, shall make all scheduled payments pursuant to the terms of the contract.” R.S.Mo. § 431.180.1.

The Missouri Merchandising Practices Act is governed primarily by the following two statutory sections:

The act, use or employment by any person of any deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, unfair practice or the concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise in trade or commerce…is declared to be an unlawful practice. R.S.Mo. § 407.020

Any person who purchases or leases merchandise primarily for personal, family or household purposes and thereby suffers an ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal, as a result of the use or employment by another person of a method, act or practice declared unlawful by section 407.020, may bring a private civil action in either the circuit court of the county in which the seller or lessor resides or in which the transaction complained of took place, to recover actual damages. R.S.Mo. § 407.025.1

In an effort to apply the foregoing statutes/acts, we explored a variety of scenarios and provided an analysis as to whether attorney’s fees were recoverable in each situation. The scenarios were the following (see above for a full analysis of each):

Scenario 1: Contractor performs construction work on residential property and seeks payment of outstanding balance owed

Scenario 2: Contractor performs work on commercial building and seeks payment of outstanding balance owed

Scenario 3: General Contractor hires Subcontractor who performs defective work on commercial project which General Contractor has to repair/replace

Scenario 4: Contractor performs allegedly defective work on residential property and is defending homeowner’s claim of defective work

Scenario 5: Contractor collects down payment for residential construction project and disappears with homeowner’s money

Scenario 6: Contractor begins residential construction project and changes pricing in middle of project

Ultimately, there is no bullet proof strategy to ensure that your construction project will go smoothly 100% of the time. However, there are certain precautionary measures that may be taken to account for situations that commonly arise in the construction realm.

The construction contract that you sign should be fair and should account for situations that may pose a problem later down the road. Most importantly, the contract should include an attorney’s fees provision. That will often ensure that the parties to a construction dispute are more cautious about their actions, and, ultimately, it demands that they act with some level of accountability.

If you have any questions regarding your construction project, dispute or potential issue, or if you need a contract drafted or reviewed, please contact our law firm to assist you.

Daniel P. Gabris | Gabris Law, LLC

7 Important Tips Roofing Contractors Should Know Before Performing Work in Missouri

The purpose of this article is to provide roofing contractors a general overview of some common compliance issues that roofers experience when conducting business in the state of Missouri. In hopes that businesses and contractors will have better statutory compliance in the future and to reduce customer complaints and unscrupulous business practices, we have prepared a general rundown of some caveats and tips that contractors should be aware of when carrying out roofing work in Missouri.

1.     Do not offer to pay any part of the customer’s deductible or provide a discount or rebate as part of the roof sale

Although you could sell the job a lot easier if the customer had no out-of-pocket expenses, Missouri law prohibits contractors from offering to pay the insurance deductible or otherwise creatively working around the statute.

The specific statute set forth under section 407.725.6, R.S.Mo., states:

“A contractor shall not advertise or promise to pay or rebate all or any portion of any insurance deductible as an inducement to the sale of goods or services.  As used in this section, a promise to pay or rebate includes granting any allowance or offering any discount against the fees to be charged or paying the insured or any person directly or indirectly associated with the property any form of compensation, gift, prize, bonus, coupon, credit, referral fee, or other item of monetary value for any reason.” R.S.Mo. § 407.725.2 (2014); https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=407.725

As you can imagine, unscrupulous contractors regularly attempt to employ this tactic on unwary customers. Replacing a roof is a lot more appealing for the customer when the customer has no expenses. However, the Missouri legislature found that the negative impact on society outweighs the benefit and have prohibited such conduct. Accordingly, roofing contractors should not utilize such techniques or make any of the above-mentioned offerings to induce the customer into entering into the contract.

If you have questions regarding advertising or the legality of other sales techniques, please do not hesitate to contact us.

2.     Do not offer to negotiate insurance claims for customers

While it may seem natural to speak to the insurance company on behalf of the customer, such conduct is prohibited in Missouri.

The statutory section, 407.725.6, R.S.Mo., which bars such conduct, states the following, in relevant part:
“A contractor shall not represent or negotiate, or offer or advertise to represent or negotiate, on behalf of an owner or possessor of real estate on any insurance claim in connection with the repair or replacement of roof systems, or the performance of any other exterior repair, replacement, construction, or reconstruction work.” R.S.Mo. § 407.725.6 (2014); https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=407.725.

The consequence of representing or negotiating on a customer’s behalf will likely constitute a violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and could evoke a response from the Missouri Attorney General or could potentially lead to punishment for the unauthorized practice of law.

If the customer has a valid insurance claim due to hail or storm damage or some other covered claim, you should make your observations and analysis and refer the homeowner to competent legal counsel to assist with obtaining coverage from the insurance company. Do not risk the potential consequences that can result from violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. The risk is not worth the reward. If you have questions regarding your statutory duties or questions about insurance contract negotiations.

3.     Include Statutory Lien Notice in your Contract

Although many contractors do not know how mechanic’s liens work, they do know that mechanic’s liens can be an effective tool to collect payment on an outstanding balance from owners or other contractors. Depending on the situation, mechanic’s liens can be instrumental in getting you paid. Thus, it is critical to ensure that you preserve the right to file a mechanic’s lien on your project. Missouri mechanic’s liens can be trick and have a few rigid statutory requirements.

One of the most important requirements of filing a mechanic’s lien is providing proper notice. Missouri requires general contractors to provide notice to owner as a prerequisite or a condition precedent to filing a mechanic’s lien. Specifically, the applicable portion of section 429.012, R.S.MO., states the following:

Every original contractor, who shall do or perform any work or labor upon, or furnish any material, fixtures, engine, boiler or machinery for any building, erection or improvements upon land, or for repairing the same, under or by virtue of any contract…shall provide to the person with whom the contract is made or to the owner if there is no contract, prior to receiving payment in any form of any kind from such person, (a) either at the time of the execution of the contract, (b) when the materials are delivered, (c) when the work is commenced, or (d) delivered with first invoice, a written notice which shall include the following disclosure language in ten-point bold type:



Any contractors who collect payment of any type on a construction project without first having provided the above-cited notice will have waived their right to file a mechanic’s lien. This does not preclude you from pursuing the owner or contractor under breach of contract or quantum meruit claims. However, it is well-advised to preserve all of your rights, so you have these respective collection tools at your disposal in case you need them. Accordingly, this notice to owner must be provided by any general contractor on the project that wants to later assert mechanic’s lien rights against the property upon which the work was performed.

4.     Include a provision in your contract that allows for the recovery of attorney’s fees

In Missouri, parties to a lawsuit can typically only recover attorney’s fees if there is some statutory or contractual basis providing for the recovery of the same. Alternatively, if there is an incredibly unique situation where equities have to be be balanced or if litigation occurs as the result of a wrong committed by a third-party, courts may allow the recovery of attorney’s fees. “Generally, awards of attorney’s fees are permitted “only when called for by a contract; when provided by statute; when incurred as an item of damages because of involvement in collateral litigation; or ‘when a court of equity finds it necessary to adjudge them in order to balance benefits.’” Boone Valley Farm, Inc. v. Historic Daniel Boone Home, Inc., 941 S.W.2d 720 (Mo. App. 1997).

Nearly every roofing contractor that calls seeking counsel asks whether they can recover attorney’s fees. Many of those contractors find that they do not have any basis for recovering attorney’s fees.

This is an easy fix, however, but it has to be implemented before the project by including the provision into the contract. A contract that includes an attorney’s fees provision gives the contractor significantly more leverage when pursuing their claim.

Obviously, the factual situation must also be evaluated because there may be some statutory basis to recover attorney’s fees despite not having the desired contractual language.  However, generally speaking, there is typically no recovery of attorney’s fees on residential projects, unless the attorney’s fees provision is in the contract, whereas there may be a right to recover attorney’s fees on a commercial project by way of the Missouri Prompt Payment Act.

For purposes of this article, we will not discuss the Missouri Prompt Payment Act. However, you should take heed to the warnings contained in this article, avoid the potential loss of leverage if the case goes to court, and protect yourself by including an attorney’s fees/costs/expenses provision in your contract. That goes for contracts with homeowners as well as those with subcontractors.

If you have questions about drafting up an attorney’s fees provision or other contractual provisions, please contact us.

5.     Include a provision that allows for the collection of interest on outstanding balances

When someone refuses to pay you, it is frustrating feeling. Not only do you want to recover the balance, but you also want to tack on an extra $100 per day or charge them anything and everything you can. The only way to get equitable recourse during the pursuit of an outstanding debt is to have the debt accruing interest. Another tool to increase the pressure is the inclusion of a liquidated damages provision. Liquidated damages are discussed at length in another article on this website, but the focus of this article is to express the importance of including an interest provision in all roofing contracts.

The industry rate that we typically see is 1.5% per month or 18% per annum interest rate on outstanding balances. That means that if you are owed $10,000 for a year, you would be entitled to collect $1,800 per year in interest in addition to the $10,000 principal amount owed. This is critical especially when many lawsuits can be stretched out over the course of a one to several years. The interest provision creates leverage against the debtor to pressure them into paying the amount that is rightfully due. Alternatively, if the case goes to trial and you prevail, the debtor will have to pay the principal and the 18% interest on that principal.

If you need help collecting from someone who owes you money for work performed, please contact us now.

6.     Form a Missouri Limited Liability Company to provide protection and to have standing to pursue any legal claims the company may have

A limited liability company can be formed under chapter 347 of the Missouri Revised Statutes. In order to be afforded limited liability protection in the state of Missouri, the organizers/management of a company must register with the Missouri Secretary of State.

Additionally, the Missouri Courts will not recognize a business entity that is not registered in the state. Thus, if the contractor is dealing with a non-paying customer, the contractor will have to standing prior to instituting a formal lawsuit in court. In order to have standing in Missouri, a limited liability company, including any roofers, whether individuals, entities, or contractors, conducting business in the state of Missouri, must register their company with the Missouri Secretary of State.

Many banks will not allow you to open a company bank account without first creating an LLC and preparing an operating agreement, obtaining an articles of organization and an EIN. Additional, there may be tax ramifications on a state and/or federal level for those companies who fail to register their LLC and/or obtain an EIN.

For numerous reasons, it is important to take care of the LLC formation and getting all of your other organizational documentation and affairs in order before conducting business in Missouri. If you need assistance in setting up or modifying an existing business, LLC, or corporation, please contact one of our lawyers for further assistance.

7.     You must allow customers who are paying through their insurance company the opportunity to cancel the roofing contract within 5 days of receiving acceptance or denial from insurance company.

Contractors have to give customers the opportunity to cancel the roofing contract in the event that the insurance company denies their claim.

The relevant portion of section 407.725.3, R.S.Mo., states:

“A person who has entered into a written contract with a contractor to provide goods or services to be paid under a property and casualty insurance policy may cancel the contract prior to midnight on the fifth business day after the insured party has received written notice from the insurer that all or any part of the claim or contract is not a covered loss under the insurance policy.”

Failure to give the customer the option to cancel the contract will be deemed a violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. Violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act can come with steep consequences and a serious headache that takes the focus off of running your business.

Please call if you have questions regarding statutory or contractual rights relating to roofing jobs.


This article was intended to inform the general public and roofing contractors about some of the important issues surrounding roofing projects and associated contracts/documentation. The article covered several provisions that should be included in roofing contracts as well as certain acts that are prohibited pursuant to Missouri law.

Specifically, the article discussed:

  1. Not using deductibles as a way to induce roof sales;
  2. Refraining from negotiating or representing customers in the insurance claims process;
  3. Include the statutory mechanic’s lien notice in your contract;
  4. Include an attorney’s fees provision in your contract;
  5. Include an interest provision in your contract for outstanding balances.

For those roofing contractors who follow these suggestions, so long as you are generally complying with OSHA requirements, other general statutes, and otherwise conducting fair business, your approach will comport with best business practices in the roofing industry.

If you need assistance or specific guidance from a Missouri construction law attorney, please do not hesitate to contact us. We offer free consultations and can provide you direction in how to move forward in your case.

Please call us now if you’re looking to learn more about your rights as a contractor.

41 Contracts Our Attorneys Draft, Review, and Litigate

Types of Contracts in Missouri

Our attorneys are experienced in handling a variety of different matters relating to contracts.

To give our clients an idea of how we can assist them with their contract needs, we have prepared a list of the contractual agreements that we have litigated or prepared for clients in the past.

We’ve also attempted to give a general description of the various agreements, so our clients and any viewer of this website will be informed regarding the types of agreements that are at their disposal.

Our attorneys are on call to answer questions about any of the agreements set forth below, and we’d be happy to draft any of these agreements or another document that is suited for your particular situation.

Acquisition Agreements

Acquisition is the gaining of wealth or control over new assets or things.  Any time that a business or assets of a business are acquired, the purchaser and/or seller would be well-advised to consider an acquisition agreement.

An acquisition agreement sets forth the terms of the transactions to eliminate uncertainty amongst the buyer and seller and facilitates the fluidity of the sale/purchase.  Many questions arise when business or commercial entities make purchases including the price, the payment terms, financing, and minor details governing the acquisition.

Ordinarily, acquisition agreements deal with acquiring equity or wholly purchasing other companies.  A number of the important negotiating points deal with closing conditions, indemnity, disclosure of liabilities, and other points that greatly affect the value of the acquisition.

Back to top

Agent or Agency Agreements

An Agency Agreement typically sets forth the role and duties of an agent to a principal.  There are numerous situations when this type of agreement may be necessary, but it is frequently seen in the real estate context as described in the brokerage agreement section.  However, it is not limited to this context.  Agency agreements are common throughout all industries.  In fact, any time that a third party (agent) is acting on behalf of a principal, there is usually some type of agency relationship.  An agency agreement is a way to memorialize that and expressly grant or limit powers which the agent has.  It is also important because it defines the duties and obligations of the agent to the principal and vice versa.

Back to top

Amendments or Modifications to a Contract

Amendments or modifications to a contract are pretty self-explanatory.  A change order would be a more specific example of an amendment or modification to a contract.  Also, in real estate transactions, the parties will often amend the contract to add conditions precedent to the sale or contingencies which make the contract dependent on a certain occurrence.  One specific example would be the contingency that the buyer has to sell their own house before the contract is binding on both parties.  Our attorneys are experienced in drafting various types of modifications or additions/deletions to contracts, and we are prepared to assist you with your situation.  Please contact one of our attorneys if you need help amending or revising a contract that doesn’t exactly fit your situation.

Back to top

Asset Purchase Agreements

Asset Purchase Agreements are a type of acquisition agreement as described above.  As most people are aware, assets are those things of value owned by a company like cash, equipment, inventory, real estate, accounts receivable, and the goodwill of the company.

When dealing with asset purchase agreements in their simplest form, it usually governs the acquisition of equity and/or stock in a company.  Many of the considerations deal with an overview of the financials of the company (assets) that the prospective buyer is looking to acquire.

The solvency of the company is obviously a major factor.  However, solvency can be described in two different ways: (1) the company cannot pay debts as they come due or (2) the liabilities of the company outweigh the assets.

The type of insolvency sometimes is of no import to investors as the purchaser/investor believes that s/he can turn the business around with a new marketing or operations model or an injection of financing will give the company the necessary cash to continue operations in order for it to realize profits from an earlier investment.  In a similar but nuanced viewpoint, some investors merely want to use the acquisition for a limited purpose as a certain product line owned by the company warrants the purchasing of the entire company.

For more information regarding asset purchase agreements see the description under Acquisition Agreements.

Back to top

Bill of Sale

A bill of sale is usually a document that evidences a transaction of personal property between two parties.  Oftentimes a bill of sale is incredibly simple.  Sometimes it conveys title, but not in every scenario. One of the most common situations where individuals will encounter a bill of sale is in the purchase or sale of a motor vehicle.  It should be noted that in Missouri and Kansas a bill of sale does not convey title.  Instead, the title of the vehicle must be assigned to the purchaser. The bill of sale merely evidences the details of the transaction (and typically serves to satisfy the statute of frauds requirement for a sale of goods over $500).

The department of revenue for each state usually has a form that can be used as the bill of sale, which contains the basic details of the transaction including make, model, and year of the vehicle as well as the mileage and other details relevant to the transaction.

In the event that you need a bill of sale for a specific situation our lawyers can prepare numerous types of bills of sale specifically customized for your situation.

Back to top

Broker-Carrier Agreements

A broker-carrier agreement usually deals with the transportation of employees or other individuals or personal property by a broker.  In this case the broker acts as the carrier for the principal in which the broker agrees to transport and the principal or the owner agrees to make payment for the broker providing logistics and/or actual physical transportation services.

Back to top

Broker (Real Estate) Agreements

Most individuals have dealt with broker real estate agreements.  A lot of times these will be called an Exclusive Limited Agent Buyer’s Agreement or Exclusive Limited Agent Seller’s Agreement.  These are just fancy names that set forth the real estate agent’s commissions, duties to, and rights against the client (purchaser or seller, depending on the principal). Real Estate broker agreements are probably the most common, but broker agreements are not strictly limited to such context.

Really, any situation where a broker or agent is acting as an intermediary creates a broker arrangement.  In such a case, the parties should consider defining their rights and duties toward each other to avoid falling at the whim of Missouri’s statutory scheme, which may not reflect what the parties intended to be the agreement.

Back to top

Business Contracts

Business Contracts come in all shapes and sizes.  Business contract is such a general description of a contract that it could really refer to anything.  Throughout this webpage, there are numerous contracts that relate to the business context.  Thus, business contract can only be defined generally as a contract that governs some type of operation, action, or transaction that arises out of, relates to, or refers to a business or commercial context.

Back to top

Change Order

A Change Order is basically a change or a modification to an original contract.  Change orders can be for the extension or reduction of time, the increase or decrease in the cost of certain items, increasing or decreasing the scope of the work, value engineering, may account for delay days or extra work requested by the owner.

A change order does not have well-defined requirements.  It must be supported by consideration as other contracts, but apart from the basic contractual requirements, change orders may come in any shape or form.  In fact, there is case law in Missouri that allows a contractor to recover on the basis of equity if extra work is performed by agreement but the change order was never reduced to writing (even if the original contract requires all change orders to be in a signed writing).

Change orders are most frequently seen in the construction industry.  Owners often avail the the reduction in price due to limited mobilization and overhead (contractors are already out on the project, so they can perform additional work for a more economical price).  One of the most common contexts where we see change orders that cause problems is when there is a remediation project for fire, water or mold damage, and the homeowner wants an addition or extra work performed on their homes.

Many times the homeowner does not realize the incredible expense that additional construction work will cost and refuses to pay.  On the other hand, some contractors take advantage of the homeowner and charge exorbitant rates.  In any case, litigation is quite common in such scenarios.

Back to top

Confidential Disclosure Agreements (CDA)

A Confidential Disclosure Agreement  or CDA or Confidential Agreement (CA) is one party’s promise to refrain from disclosing information that is confidential to the other party, such as trade secrets, classified information, or proprietary information.

In many situations where the company deals with sensitive or confidential information that is critical to the success of the company, the employment agreement will include a clause or even a separate contract that pertains to confidential disclosure or non-disclosure agreements. Confidential disclosure agreement is a close relative to the non-disclosure agreement, or even a twin, depending on the language used.

Back to top

Construction Contracts

Construction Contracts come in all shapes and sizes.  Depending on the type of project, owner requirements, or general contractor capabilities, a contract specifically catered to the situation may be necessary.

The following are a number of different types of contracts which may be used on a construction project and can be prepared by our attorneys for your use.

1.      Unit Price Contracts

2.      Lump Sum or Fixed Price Contract

3.      Cost-Plus Contracts

4.      Time and Material Contracts

5.      Incentive Contracts

6.      Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts

7.      Percentage of Construction Contracts

Back to top

Contract for Building & Sale of Residential Property

A contract to build and sell real estate to be used as a residence is common when a consumer hires a general contractor to construct a home for them.  The home purchaser would be well-advised to have an attorney draft the contract, paying close attention to the terms contained therein as the purchase of a new home is a major decision.  One that can greatly affect the life of the home purchaser, and the purchaser should have recourse in the event that the builder does not perform the work as agreed upon by the parties.

Equally, a home builder should have a contract for the construction and sale of a residence prepared in a manner favorable to the builder.  This is critical for the builder because there are numerous responsibilities and duties that should be accounted for in the contract in order to clarify the parties’ responsibilities.

Any additional work for which the builder is not compensated is lost money for the builder. The purpose of a builder or general contractor that constructs homes is to make a profit and a valuable final product for the home purchaser.  However, to ensure that the builder stays in business, there must be some element of profitability.  If the duties are not well-defined, and the builder has to continue to perform extra work without compensation therefor, the builder is losing money. For that reason, the contractor should have a contract drafted to protect its/his/her interests.

Back to top

Deed of Trust

A deed of trust is the name for a mortgage in Missouri.  Despite the common misconception, on a technical level, a mortgage is not used in Missouri.  Instead, we use a deed of trust.

The way a deed of trust works is as follows: when a bank or financial institution gives a loan to a borrower, so the borrower can buy the house, the bank wants to be able to reduce its risk and ensure that it gets paid back on its loan.  Accordingly, the bank wants some type of collateral to secure the loan.  The house serves as the collateral for the loan.  The deed of trust evidences the bank’s security in the house.

In order for the bank to put third parties on notice (put all the world on notice as the treatises and legal textbooks like to say) that it has first dibs on the house (the house is collateral and the bank has priority), the bank files a deed of trust with the local recorder of deeds office. Thus, as a matter of course, a deed of trust usually is executed at the same time that the bank issues a promissory note (loan) in order to make sure that it takes priority as a creditor in the event that the borrower defaults on the note.

There are a number of other differences between a deed of trust and a mortgage.  However, for the sake of brevity and to stay focused, the differences between mortgages and deeds of trust are explained in more intimate detail on the real estate section of this website.

Back to top

Employment Agreement

Whether a worker has an employment agreement or not really depends on the type of work.  Given the fact that Missouri is an employment at will state, employers are not really incentivized to enter into contracts with their employees.

In certain limited circumstances to give the employees peace of mind or to create a sense of security, the employer will enter into an employment agreement for a certain term.  Many of these contracts are based on contingencies, which often relate to performance.

Back to top

Equipment Use Agreements

Equipment Use Agreements are essentially rental agreements.  Equipment is usually personal property, articles, or goods used for some commercial or business operation.  This does not mean that equipment use agreements are not present in consumer transactions.  However, typically these types of agreements are witnessed more frequently when a business enterprise is renting equipment to carry out some particular commercial purpose.  These agreements are important as they can be based on time of usage, fixed time periods, fixed prices, and/or a number of other hybrids or unique methods of pricing.

Back to top

Exclusive Limited Buyer’s Agreements

This type of agreement is typically seen in the context of a homebuyer-real estate agent relationship.  The real estate agent wants to ensure that his/her commission is set forth in writing, and the agreement also typically includes the statutory and fiduciary responsibilities and duties owed to the homebuyer.

Back to top

Forbearance Agreement

A forbearance agreement is typically the prolongation of payment on a loan or the foreclosure of a property.  Forbearance in general refers to a situation where one party foregoes its legal right.

According to studentaid.ed.gov, with a forbearance “you may be able to stop making [student loan] payments or reduce your monthly payment up to 12 months.” However, it should be noted that interest will continue to accrue during the time period that the loan is in forbearance.  These types of provisions may be negotiated out of forbearance agreements, by an industrious lawyer, but the flexibility of the agreement varies from situation to situation.

Back to top

Guaranty (Personal Guaranty)

A guaranty or sometimes referred to as a personal guaranty is when a person agrees to pay for the debt of another.  These are usually required to create security for the lending of money or other property.  Accordingly, these are most common when dealing with banks or financial institutions where the lending of money is involved.  Additionally, when companies have a line of credit, the banks offering the line of credit want to secure it with a personal guaranty from a member or shareholder of the corporate entity.  Similarly, when someone has poor credit the lender will often require a co-signer or a personal guarantor before agreeing to lend the money.

The word co-signer is used loosely in most contexts.  However, from a technical standpoint it can mean either personal guarantor or surety.  For most people, this does not make a difference, but looking at it technically, a surety usually has primary liability and upon default, a creditor can go after the surety without first pursuing the borrower.

However, when a creditor wishes to pursue a personal guarantor, typically the law requires that the creditor have made a good faith attempt, or exhaust its legal remedies, to collect against the original borrower.  These two variations are sometimes semantics as the language of the guaranty may account for the situation and make any co-signer primarily liable.

Guaranty agreements come in various shapes and sizes.  Below are a few examples of different types of personal guaranty agreements:

  1. Absolute
  2. Conditional
  3. Continuing
  4. General
  5. Specific
  6. Special

If you need a guaranty drafted, we have attorneys with experience litigating and preparing various types.

Back to top

Independent Contractor Agreement (ICA)

Independent Contractor Agreement is a contract that sets forth the duties of an independent contractor and clarifies the relationship between the hiring company and the contractor.  An independent contractor is typically hired by a person or entity to perform a designated task, but legally, the hiring person/entity does not have control over the independent contractor.

Back to top

Employee v. Independent Contractor

Missouri courts state the following to determine “the existence of the independent contractor relationship, the common law of agency right to control shall be applied. The common law of agency right to control test shall include but not be limited to: If the alleged employer retains the right to control the manner and means by which the results are to be accomplished, the individual who performs the service is an employee. If only the results are controlled, the individual performing the service is an independent contractor.” Fritts v. Williams, 992 S.W.2d 375 (Mo. App. S.D., 1999).

The independent contractor agreement merely lays out the responsibilities and duties of the contracted party.  Additionally, it may be the employer or hiring party’s opportunity to include certain risk allocating provisions such as an indemnity clause.  An indemnity clause is further defined below under the common contractual provisions section.

Back to top

Lease Agreement

A lease is probably one of the most common agreements that a real estate lawyer has to draft.  There are certain critical provisions that a landlord will want in a lease.  A number of those provisions, though seemingly minor, can make a huge difference when dealing with a troublesome tenant.

Generally described, a lease is when an owner of real property agrees to convey the right of use of the property in exchange for rent payments, usually in the form of cash, but may also be in-kind (something of value other than cash).

For information about Landlord-Tenant Law in Missouri follow the foregoing link. 

Regardless of whether a lease is for commercial or residential rental property, there are a number of provisions that should be included in the lease to ensure that your rights are protected—no matter whether you are the landlord or the tenant.

If you need a lease drafted or revised, we are more than happy to assist you.  Also, in the event that you need to enforce the provisions of a Missouri lease, or if you need to evict a non-paying tenant, please contact one of our landlord-tenant attorneys today.

Back to top

Master Services Agreements

A master services agreement or master service agreement is a contract between two parties who usually have an ongoing relationship.  The master agreement sets forth the common terms that the parties have agreed upon, and it can be used as the basic foundation for any future agreements.  Thus, the provisions of the master services agreement are usually incorporated by reference into any of the future agreements between the parties.

Back to top

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

A memorandum of understanding is sometimes referred to as a letter of intent.  A letter of intent is a statement reduced to writing which details the preliminary understanding of two or more parties who plan to enter into a contract.

Many sources state that a memorandum of understanding is not binding.  However, Missouri courts often treat these agreements as contracts, and in most of the cases in which a memorandum of understanding is discussed, such document involves a school, city, or other governmental entity.  In other limited circumstances, the parties used the memorandum of understanding to divide their interests in a business or form a partnership.

A letter of intent that is signed by high school football athletes, committing to a university, are bound by signing the letter of intent.  According to www.nationalletter.org, an athlete agrees to attend the academic institution for a period of one year in exchange for the institution granting a specified amount of financial aid.

Back to top


A mortgage was generally defined above under deed of trust.  In Missouri a deed of trust is used, but the counterpart of the deed of trust is the mortgage, which is used in states like Kansas, Iowa, and Oklahoma.

From a practical standpoint the difference is slight and is predominantly felt in the foreclosure process.  A mortgage requires a judicial foreclosure (use of the court process to effectuate a foreclosure), whereas a deed of trust allows for a non-judicial foreclosure (where the property can be sold on the courthouse steps.

The mortgage basically represents the lender’s security in its collateral (the house).  Once the promissory note is paid in full, the lender must file a release of mortgage with the recorder of deeds which extinguishes the mortgage.  In most states, there are statutes which penalize any lenders who do not timely file releases of mortgage.

If you need a mortgage drafted or a subordination agreement prepared, we can help you do so.

Back to top

Non-Compete Contracts

Non-Compete Contracts are not as typical as including a mere non-compete covenant into a contract.  Typically, when there is danger of usurping the business from an employer, the employer, in order to protect itself, includes a non-compete clause into the contract.  The non-compete clause prevents the party subjected to such clause from engaging in the same type of business in the same geographic region for a certain time period.  Missouri courts typically require.

Missouri does not look favorably at non-compete agreements:

Contracts in restraint of trade are unlawful in Missouri. Section 416.031 RSMo (1994).3 “A promise is in restraint of trade if its performance would limit competition in any business or restrict the promisor in the exercise of a gainful occupation.” RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS Section 186(2) (1981). “Every promise that relates to a business dealing or to a professional or other gainful occupation operates as a restraint in the sense that it restricts the promisor’s future activity.” Id., cmt. a. Restrictive covenants limiting individuals in the exercise or pursuit of their occupations are in restraint of trade. Sturgis Equip. Co., Inc. v. Falcon Indus. Sales Co., 930 S.W.2d 14, 16 (Mo.App. 1996). Post-employment restrictions are generally considered restraints of trade. House of Tools & Engineering, Inc. v. Price, 504 S.W.2d 157, 159 (Mo.App. 1973). Healthcare Services of Ozarks, Inc. v. Copeland, No. 26410 (MO 7/27/2005) (Mo, 2005).

However, there are certain limited circumstances where Missouri courts have allowed them:

“there are two areas in which non-compete agreements may be enforceable. ‘A restrictive covenant in an employment agreement is only valid and enforceable if it is necessary to protect one of two well-defined interests, trade secrets and customer contacts, and if it is reasonable as to time and place.’” Healthcare Services of Ozarks, Inc. v. Copeland, No. 26410 (MO 7/27/2005) (Mo, 2005)(quoting in part Schmersahl, Treloar & Co., P.C. v. McHugh, 28 S.W.3d 345, 348 (Mo.App. 2000).

Back to top

Non-Disclosure Agreements  (NDA)

A non-disclosure agreement is one party’s agreement not to disclose trade secrets, innovative or sensitive information of a company.  These are typically signed by employees who work in industries where certain trade secrets carry significant value.

Non-disclosure agreements are also used in contexts where one person or entity is proposing a business plan, and said person or entity wishes to keep the information disclosed in the meeting confidential.  Hence non-disclosure agreements are sometimes referred to as confidential disclosure agreements.

Back to top

Operating Agreements

The Missouri Secretary of State defines operating agreement as: “an internal document (it is not filed with the Secretary of State or any other government agency) that establishes the rules and regulations for the conduct of the company’s business and affairs, and the rights, powers and duties of the company’s members, managers and employees. https://www.sos.mo.gov/business/outreach/startup_guide

Typically the operating agreement is responsible for defining:

  • The classes or groups of members and their rights and benefits;
  • Voting structure for company decisions;
  • Restrictions on transfer of membership interests;
  • Allocation of income and losses among the members; and
  • Tax elections for the company.

The above information is taken from the Missouri Secretary of State website discussing :  https://www.sos.mo.gov/business/outreach/startup_guide

An operating agreement is necessary and required by Missouri statute when forming a limited liability company (LLC).

Back to top

Partnership Agreements

Pursuant to R.S.Mo § 359.011, a partnership agreement is “any valid agreement, written or oral, of the partners as to the affairs of a limited partnership and the conduct of its business.”

In essence, a partnership agreement defines the rights and obligations of partners.  It does not necessarily limited to only two partners.  Often times more than two people or entities can become partners.  The type of relationship typically depends on the structure of the business.

In Missouri a partnership is defined, under R.S.Mo § 358.060, as “an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit and includes, for all purposes of the laws of this state, a registered limited liability partnership”

Missouri statutory scheme allows individuals to form general partnerships, limited partnerships, limited liability partnerships, and limited liability limited partnerships.  These forms all have different statutory default rules that are generally set forth under Missouri Chapters 358 and 359.

Usually when individuals or entities are interested in forming a partnership, they would like to have their own terms in place in order to supersede the default rules laid out in Missouri statutes.

This objective can be accomplished by hiring one of our attorneys to draft a partnership agreement for you.  For further counsel regarding your rights in forming a partnership or to have one of our attorneys draft an agreement for you, please contact us.

Back to top

Prenuptial (or Antenuptial) Agreement

A prenuptial agreement or sometimes referred to as an antenuptial agreement is entered into prior to marriage and is designed to pre-plan the division of property and marital support upon the termination of the marriage.

Back to top

Professional Services Agreement (PSA)

A professional services agreement (PSA) is used to enter into a contract with a person or entity providing professional services, such as a consultant, an attorney, an accountant, or some other professional, which provides services.

The services agreement typically requires the non-consulting party to allow access to its company information, documentation, and/or facilities to allow the service provider to access and perform the designated tasks.  The professional services agreement essentially delineates the duties and responsibilities of each party and attempts to clarify any potential gray areas relating to the relationship.

Back to top

Promissory Note

A promissory note is a loan in which one party lends money to another in exchange for a promise to pay the other back, usually with a certain fixed interest rate.

Back to top

Power of Attorney

A power of attorney is a document that can come in all shapes and sizes.  Often we see a power of attorney drafted in the context of an estate plan.  In such a case, typically durable powers of attorney are drafted in order for the power of attorney (powers granted to the agent/attorney-in-fact) to survive mental incapacitation in the event that the principal (person who appoints someone as their attorney-in-fact) cannot make decisions for himself/herself.

In other instances, commonly seen in the real estate context, a husband or wife, who may not be able to attend the closing and will grant their spouse the authority to sign on their behalf in their absence.  Usually the power of attorney will be limited in time and scope.  For example, the limited power of attorney may only last until a few days after the closing is scheduled to occur.  Other times the length of time is a fixed duration.

With respect to limiting the powers of the attorney-in-fact, the power of attorney may limit the powers to signing, authorizing certain transactions, or limit the powers to only dealing with certain limited entities or persons.

The most common in the real estate context is stated above, but the most common in the estate planning context are powers of attorney for health care and powers of attorney for financial decisions.  If you need a power of attorney, our lawyers are more than happy to discuss what may be best for your situation, and we can assist with the drafting of the same.

Back to top

Purchase Order

A purchase order is a statement in writing which documents the purchase of goods but allows the purchaser to make payment at a later time.

A purchase order usually includes:

  • Type or name of product
  • Quantity purchased
  • General terms and conditions
  • Special terms and conditions (specific to that purchase)

In order for a purchase order to become a contract, the buyer must accept the purchase order and the terms thereof.

Transactions that involve a purchase order are typically governed by the Uniform Commercial Code as they involve the sale of goods.  The Uniform Commercial Code is applicable in Missouri as it has been adopted by all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the various U.S. territories. Accordingly, Missouri case law, in interpreting the Uniform Commercial Code, will presumably hold that a buyer impliedly accepts the terms and conditions of a purchase order by merely accepting the goods and failing to reject within a certain specified amount of time.

Accordingly, it is important to read any purchase orders, including the fine print.  If you don’t understand the language set forth therein, please contact one of our attorneys to assist you with understanding your rights and duties under said agreement.

Back to top

Real Estate Contracts

A majority of Missouri’s citizens will have reviewed and executed a real estate contract in their lifetime. Oftentimes the purchase of a home is the biggest decision in one’s life.  The real estate contract in chock full of legalese and boilerplate provisions, making it difficult to understand and know exactly what you’re getting yourself into with the home purchase.

However, usually when the real estate contract is supplied by a reputable real estate agent, the contract has been approved by the brokerage firm, and the use of which is required by said brokerage firm.  Accordingly, the terms of the contract are usually drafted to be fair for both the buyer and seller.

Back to top

Sale of Goods Contracts

Sale of goods contracts obviously deal with any transactions where the parties are buying or selling goods.  These transactions are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code, which applies in every state, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. territories, as briefly discussed above.

In certain situations, a sale of goods contract is required to be in writing signed by the party to be charged.  In the event, that the contract is not in writing and signed, the party attempting to defend the case may assert a defense called the statute of frauds.  This bars contracts for the sale of goods which equal or exceed $500.00.

The Missouri statute, which is applicable to this situation, section 400.2-201, states the following, in relevant part:

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of five hundred dollars or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker.

Accordingly, it is important to make sure that your transaction, particularly when dealing with sales and purchases of goods, is in compliance with Missouri law.  One of our contract lawyers can assist you with drafting this type of agreement if you find yourself in that situation.

Back to top

Sales Commission Agreements

A sales commission agreement sets forth the commissions that an employer will pay the commissioned sales representative.  In a number of industries, especially in the financial industry, the sales commission agreement prevents a salesperson’s commission from becoming vested until a certain period of time passes or certain triggering event occurs.  For example, some companies will pay their sales representative on a monthly basis.

When the sale is made, the salesperson would receive his/her commission the following month.  However, the contract would require the sales representative to pay back any amount that is not vested in the event that the customer cancels the policy.  Usually the time period for vesting, which is included in the agreement, would take into consideration the amount of time the customer has to cancel or in which the right to revoke expires.

Salespersons should be aware of this and those companies, firms, and organizations employing a sales staff should ensure that their sales commission contracts contain clauses which account for any cancellation of policies or return of products if commission is distributed concurrently (or in close proximity thereto).

Back to top

Security Agreements

A security agreement is a document that represents a party’s interests in personal or real property. The agreement is considered “secured” because the return of payment is “secured” by some type of collateral.

For example, in some circumstances, the security agreement uses personal property as the collateral, such as a car.  Car dealerships usually would enter into a retail installment sales contract at that time, which would contain the financing terms as well as the language that would reflect the fact that the vehicle would be treated as the security.  The retail installment sales contract is the security agreement. In order to perfect the security agreement, a notation is put on the title that shows the lender’s interest in the vehicle.

When real property is used as security, typically the security agreement is called a deed of trust or mortgage.  As noted above in this article, in Missouri the security agreement used for homes is called the deed of trust.  This is entered into concurrently with the promissory note.  The lender is known as the mortgagee because the borrower is giving them a mortgage (deed of trust).  Thus, the borrower in that transaction, even when it involves a deed of trust, is known as the mortgagor.

The foregoing examples represent typical uses of a security agreement.  However, there are numerous types of security agreements. If you want to lend someone money, but you want to make sure that you are paid back on that loan, then you should consider securing the loan with some type of collateral.

Security agreements require that the document state:

  • It must state that there is a security interest;
  • It must describe the collateral; and
  • It must be signed by the borrower/debtor.

If you find yourself in a situation, where you want to lend money, and you need direction or a security agreement drafted, please contact one of our attorneys.

Back to top

Service Contract

A service contract is a broad name for an agreement which relates to the provision of services.  The services provided under the contract can range from strictly services, such as painting, landscaping, installation of electrical in a building, etc, to provision of services and materials, which could be the same type of contract, but would the owner would provide the materials in the former type of contract.

Back to top

Settlement Agreements

Any time parties are involved in a dispute, litigation, claims, or if they have any other theory of recovery against each other, the most efficient resolution is entering into a settlement agreement.  Presuming the attorney who drafts the settlement agreement properly prepares the same, any subsequent attempt at bringing a lawsuit would be barred by the settlement agreement.

In a typical settlement agreement the parties state the background of the dispute that gives rise to the settlement agreement, both parties usually deny any liability against themselves, and then the parties mutually waive future (and sometimes all) claims against each other.

The parties will also list out the terms of the settlement agreement, usually including the amount each party will be paying to the other, the terms of payment, and any other terms that would relate to dismissing the lawsuit.  Usually the settlement agreement will also include provisions which account for the default of any of the parties’ duties.

Back to top

Subordination Agreements

Our lawyers are well-versed in real property transactions and have dealt extensively with title companies, closing companies, and lenders. In certain situations, lenders will agree to make their loan junior to a new lender.  In these cases, a subordination agreement subordinates the senior loan to make it junior (typically to a new loan).

However, as a sidenote, it is not necessary that the loan is a newly originated loan as any loan can be subordinated so long as the lender or financial institution agrees to subordinate their loan.

After the subordination agreements are signed and notarized by the parties, they are usually filed in the recorder of deeds in the county in which the real property at issue is located.  The filing of the subordination agreement puts all the world on notice that the subordinated loan now takes a subordinate position to the other.

Back to top

Takeover Agreement

A takeover agreement is often used in the construction industry by and between a surety and a contractor.  When a contractor who purchased a bond defaults on their performance under a performance bond, the surety is then required to step in and the takeover agreement defines the duties and obligations of the surety to complete the performance of the original contract.  For the most part, the surety will typically hire another contractor to come in and complete the work and merely provides the financing.

As a sidenote, usually the defaulting contractor is required to indemnify the surety, but the defaulting contractor probably defaulted for a reason and may not be in a position to indemnify the surety.

Back to top

Transportation Agreements

Transportation is described as the movement of goods or people from one location to another. When employees wish to transport goods or persons, they usually have to enter into some type of agreement to effectuate this purpose.  Typically, the employer wants to delineate the services offered and limit liability to the extent possible.

In certain situations, where the entity or person providing the transportation is deemed to be a common carrier, any clauses that purport to limit liability may be against public policy.  An attorney that is astute in drafting transportation agreements, and who is aware of the case law articulating exculpatory provisions in carrier agreements, can potentially prepare a contract that will protect the carrier in a number of circumstances.

In any event, if you are an employer or looking to transport people or goods, you should have a contract in place that sets forth your duties, obligations, and limits your potential liability.  For assistance with drafting a transportation agreement, contact an attorney today.

Back to top

St. Louis Construction Contract Attorneys

Federal Courthouse and St. Louis ArchConstruction Contract Litigators

Our firm deals with construction contracts on a regular basis.  Nearly all work performed on a construction project is carried out pursuant to a contract with the owner, contractor, subcontractor, or some other party on the project.  

The purpose of the contract is to govern the relationship between the entities and determine the duties and obligations that the contract imposes upon said parties. That’s why when problems occur on the project, you need to know the terms of the contract.  You also should have a lawyer review or draft your contract before beginning a project.  

The lawyer can explain your rights to you, and help you understand your responsibilities on the job.

Assistance with Construction Contracts

In order to protect our clients on a project, our construction law attorneys provide the following assistance with contractual matters:

      1. Reviewing
      2. Drafting
      3. Negotiating
      4. Litigating

The above list is just an example of a few areas where we can help.  If you need any assistance with contracts on a construction project, please contact an attorney at our office, and we can help you sort through any issues.

Answering your Construction Contract Law Question

Issues almost always arise on a construction project.  Sometimes Contractors wonder whether they are supposed to pay for the issue or whether someone else should be footing the bill.  The contract almost always governs these situations.

That is why it is critical to know and understand the terms of your construction contract. On big construction projects the contracts can be quite extensive with voluminous amounts of legalese that can be difficult to understand.

Our construction law attorneys can sort through that dense language and advise you as to how you should best proceed on the project.  Make sure that you know your rights if you’re working on a construction project, and consult with an attorney.

If you have a question about whether your contract is in compliance with Missouri law or whether certain clauses should be added or struck to protect your interests, contact one of our St. Louis Construction Lawyers today.

Other Types of Contracts Our Attorneys Draft and Litigate

Acquisition Agreements
Agent or Agency Agreements
Amendments or Modifications to a Contract
Asset Purchase Agreements
Bill of Sale
Broker-Carrier Agreements
Broker (Real Estate) Agreements
Business Contracts
Change Orders
Confidential Disclosure Agreements (CDA)
Construction Contracts
Unit Price Contracts
Lump Sum or Fixed Price Contracts
Cost-Plus Contracts
Time and Material Contracts
Incentive Contracts
Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts
Percentage of Construction Contracts
Contract for Building & Sale of Residential Property
Deed of Trust
Employment Agreements
Equipment Use Agreements
Exclusive Limited Buyer’s Agreements
Forbearance Agreements
Independent Contractor Agreement (ICA)
Lease Agreements
Master Services Agreements
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Non-Compete Contracts
Non-Disclosure Agreements  (NDA)
Operating Agreements
Partnership Agreements
Personal Guaranty
Prenuptial Agreements
Professional Services Agreements
Promissory Note
Power of Attorney
Purchase Order
Real Estate Contracts
Sale of Goods Contracts
Sales Commission Agreements
Security Agreements
Service Contracts
Settlement Agreements
Subordination Agreements
Transportation Agreements

Also, check out our article regarding 7 Provisions that Should be in Every Construction Contract